Search for: "THOMAS v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP." Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 For a case discussing the distinctions between these two types of warnings in detail, read Thomas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
American Standard, Inc., 179 P.3d 905, 914 (Cal. 2008) (“[r]equiring manufacturers to warn their products’ users in all instances would place an onerous burden on them and would invite mass consumer disregard and ultimate contempt for the warning process”); Thompson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Supplemental brief addressed to the amicus brief of the United States in American Home Products Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
We were just reading an interesting, relatively new, decision from our home Circuit, Reilly v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Although it was a unanimous judgment, Alito was joined by just four other Justices (Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Jackson). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Congress cannot force them to consume a product today (expensive health insurance) because Congress thinks that they might eventually use something related to the product in the future. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Nursing Homes: HOME'S NEGLECT CAUSED ACTOR GENE BARRY'S DEATH, FAMILY SAYS, Barry v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It doesn't matter what the product is (it doesn't even have to be a product). [read post]